Talk:Robert Stiegler

Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment
This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 29 January 2019 and 7 May 2019. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Westnilebaptsit.

Above undated message substituted from Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment by PrimeBOT (talk) 03:10, 18 January 2022 (UTC)

Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment
This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 29 January 2020 and 5 May 2020. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Georgcortes. Peer reviewers: Livmeyer, Kstone3.

Above undated message substituted from Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment by PrimeBOT (talk) 03:10, 18 January 2022 (UTC)

Peer review
You have a good amount of information based on his academic experiences as well as exhibitions. The opening is strong, but maybe you could break it apart to fill in more information and create new sections. I think this will help readers better understand the chronological order in which Stiegler experienced his education and where his work has ended up. Double check your bibliography is within Wikipedia format, as well as create some links to other pages within your article.

Maybe the title "Film showings" could be "Film screenings". The scholarship/ grants section is small enough that that information could be included within a paragraph. Given most of you listings are a larger number, perhaps it isn't necessary to have a "grant" box.--Kstone3 (talk) 19:21, 3 March 2020 (UTC)

Under the Biography section where Stiegler's admission into University of Illinois, the wording "he headed" should be more like "he enrolled in the photography Department".--Kstone3 (talk) 19:26, 3 March 2020 (UTC) General info Whose work are you reviewing? (provide username) Georgecortes Link to draft you're reviewing: Robert Stiegler This article was written concisely and understandably. However, the first sentence in the biography section did not have a citation. There also isn't a source directly attached to the statement that he was a professor. Much of the film career section also lack citation. It would also be helpful to include more information about his style of work in general and what themes are present in his art, as this was a glaring content gap. To me, the organization of this article made total sense and worked well with the content, although I would say a small edit could be capitalizing the word "career" in the heading titles. The lead contained only information that was later elaborated on in the article, and this made a lot of sense to me. I would obviously add a mention of his style of work once this information is hopefully added to the article. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Livmeyer (talk • contribs) 22:52, 9 March 2020 (UTC)

Review
Good lead section, but avoid language like "very influential." Instead, demonstrate how he was "very influential" by noting artists / filmmakers he influenced, academic programs he developed, exhibitions in which he participated, or institutions who collected his work. Turn your annotated bibliography into the rest of your article, according to Wikipedia formatting. Review WP's guidelines on writing bibliographic material. Also review Wikipedia's guidelines on citations and sources. WP:CSAmyDeer (talk) 21:17, 6 March 2018 (UTC)

Review
You don't need to capitalize "filmmaker" or "photographer" in the beginning. also names of museums don't need to be bolded, just give them links. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Cjbentley666 (talk • contribs) 15:57, 7 March 2018 (UTC)