Talk:Robert Stroud/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

Reviewer: Jionpedia (talk · contribs) 19:25, 31 August 2013 (UTC)

Will review this article on Monday. Regards, Jionpedia  ✉  19:25, 31 August 2013 (UTC)

Extremely, extremely sorry for the delay. Wasn't in the mood for reviewing. Here are the comments:

No problems
 * Lead

Looks good
 * Early life and arrest


 * Prison life
 * There are some problems regarding the date format. In most of the places, the dates are written in mdy format. But in one place, the date is written in dmy format. Please change it.

No problems
 * The Birdman of Leavenworth

Pretty good
 * Alcatraz

Looks okay
 * Legacy


 * Sources are pretty solid.
 * Overall, the article is in great shape. Will pass it when the single point gets addressed. Thanks, Jionpedia  ✉  13:48, 4 September 2013 (UTC)

That's OK, no need to apologize, whenever you feel like doing it! I'm the same and sometimes might take me a week. Dates now formatted, thanks.♦ Dr. Blofeld  15:43, 4 September 2013 (UTC)

Final analysis
GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria


 * 1) Is it reasonably well written?
 * A. Prose quality:
 * B. MoS compliance:
 * 1) Is it factually accurate and verifiable?
 * A. References to sources:
 * B. Citation of reliable sources where necessary:
 * C. No original research:
 * 1) Is it broad in its coverage?
 * A. Major aspects:
 * B. Focused:
 * 1) Is it neutral?
 * Fair representation without bias:
 * 1) Is it stable?
 * No edit wars, etc:
 * 1) Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?
 * A. Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales:
 * B. Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions:
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass or Fail:

Great job, passing the article.Jionpedia  ✉  15:57, 4 September 2013 (UTC)