Talk:Robert Stuart Nathan

Suggestions
I came here because it was mentioned elsewhere. The first thing that caught my attention was the lede. It contains too much detail and puffery in my opinion.

The other thing that caught my attention was that the article quickly lost my attention. Seriously. Try to read the thing. It needs more work by someone adept familiar with prose and less work from someone skilled at resume writing.

I can try to help but I'll hold off while this occupies the drama boards. - UnbelievableError (talk) 04:08, 31 May 2013 (UTC)