Talk:Robert T. Webb Sculpture Garden

NFCC violations removed
There is zero critical commentary on the works, we dont need to see each work to understand that it exists. BRD doesnt apply to NFCC I am re-removing. The files violate WP:NFCC#1,3,8 and shouldnt be re-added. Werieth (talk) 19:54, 5 December 2013 (UTC)
 * So a day after being blocked for edit warring (and apparently not for the first time), you attempt to start another war? "BRD doesnt apply to NFCC I am re-removing." Really, how so? I remind you once again: these are your interpretations of policy, not the only interpretation. You are not the final word.  freshacconci  talk to me  19:58, 5 December 2013 (UTC)
 * The files that I removed where decorative, they are not critical to the content and are eye candy. Please keep personal issues out of this policy discussion. Werieth (talk) 20:02, 5 December 2013 (UTC)
 * You flatter yourself. This is nothing personal -- I'm pointing out the editing patterns of a disruptive and uncivil editor, patterns that impact on policy discussion. And I notice you don't really respond to my points. That's quite telling.  freshacconci  talk to me  20:05, 5 December 2013 (UTC)
 * There is one sentence that provides any reference to File:Rob Willms Trojan Taurus.jpg and that is a very very basic sentence stating what the genre the work is, there is zero critical commentary. WP:NFCC requires that the file's removal is detrimental given a lack of critical commentary, it is no where near being met. Werieth (talk) 20:06, 5 December 2013 (UTC)
 * Again, "requires"? No, it does not say that. I quote in its entirety: "Non-free content is used only if its presence would significantly increase readers' understanding of the topic, and its omission would be detrimental to that understanding." Let me break that down for you: you feel the image does not increase the readers' understanding and that its omission is not detrimental to understanding. I disagree. The only thing "required" is a discussion.  freshacconci  talk to me  20:12, 5 December 2013 (UTC)
 * What part of the text is not understandable without the image? The article is about a garden, one example of the types of work there will serve the same purpose, we dont need a image for each work in the garden. If you think this warrants a wider discussion WP:NFCR is your third door on your left. Werieth (talk) 20:17, 5 December 2013 (UTC)