Talk:Robert fitzRoger/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

Reviewer: Gog the Mild (talk · contribs) 16:32, 19 February 2022 (UTC)

Gog the Mild (talk) 17:19, 19 February 2022 (UTC)
 * Any reason why his children aren't listed in the infobox?
 * I have no idea - the person who added the infobox didn't bother, I guess. -- Ealdgyth (talk) 17:55, 20 February 2022 (UTC)
 * Should Eure be linked?
 * Actually - that "lord of ..." clause was inserted here without a source ... and I just removed it. Ealdgyth (talk) 17:55, 20 February 2022 (UTC)
 * "FitzRoger founded the monastery of Langley, Norfolk in 1195." Optional, but in UK English that would be FitzRoger founded the monastery of Langley in Norfolk in 1195.'
 * Fixed. Another helpful addition from someone else. Ealdgyth (talk) 17:55, 20 February 2022 (UTC)
 * Could we have an in line explanation of Michaelmas at first mention in the main article. Bracketed if you prefer.
 * I added an explanatory footnote - as the short version was still way long. Ealdgyth (talk) 17:55, 20 February 2022 (UTC)
 * Link sheriff.
 * Link Premonstratensian canons.
 * Link Langley.
 * I linked to the abbey instead. Ealdgyth (talk) 17:55, 20 February 2022 (UTC)
 * "Orford Castle". Add 'in Suffolk'.
 * Link Newburn.
 * Link Whalton.
 * "one knight's fee". Explanation please.
 * Linked. Ealdgyth (talk) 17:55, 20 February 2022 (UTC)


 * I think I got all of the above. Ealdgyth (talk) 17:55, 20 February 2022 (UTC)


 * "was an Anglo-Norman nobleman" I can't find this in the main article.
 * This one is going to have to be "the sky is blue" type of thing. He held lands and offices in Anglo-Norman England and he wasn't clergy - so the fact that he held office makes him ipso-facto a nobleman in this time. "He was considered a baron" is pretty much the big clue there. Ealdgyth (talk) 19:35, 20 February 2022 (UTC)
 * Yeah, yeah. I just want you to use the phrase "Anglo-Norman" in the main article. (Or remove it from the lead.) We both know it is a given, but the rules say that if you put it in the summary - the lead - you should put at least the same information in the article.
 * It's there now. Ealdgyth (talk) 20:04, 20 February 2022 (UTC)