Talk:Robert of Bridlington/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

Reviewer: Amitchell125 (talk · contribs) 08:08, 5 June 2022 (UTC)

Happy to review the article.

Lead section

 * Link theologian.
 * during the period – ‘from’?
 * There is an image available here which you might wish to add.

1 Life

 * Link Biblical commentary (Exegesis); Cistercians.
 * Office occurs five times in three sentences, consider reducing the frequency.
 * I would amend "Robertus cognomento Scriba quartus prior" or "Robert surnamed Scribe fourth prior" to ‘ Robertus cognomento Scriba quartus prior (‘Robert surnamed Scribe fourth prior’).
 * published yet – I’m unsure that yet works (see MOS:RELTIME).
 * securely - ‘definitely’? (minor point).

5 References

 * Knowles et al – a url is available at https://archive.org/details/headsofreligious0000unse_o8c0/page/n3/mode/2up.
 * Use https://anticompositetools.toolforge.org/hyphenator/ to ensure the formatting of the ISBNs is consistent.

6 Further reading

 * https://www.google.co.uk/books/edition/The_Glossa_Ordinaria/dTawCQAAQBAJ?hl=en&gbpv=1&dq=Robert+of+Bridlington+theology&pg=PA205&printsec=frontcover - p205 mentions Robert's reputation.

On hold
I'm putting the article on hold for a week until 13 June to allow time for the issues raised to be addressed, although there are not that many points that need sorting. Regards, Amitchell125 (talk) 12:54, 5 June 2022 (UTC)


 * All done but the url for Knowles et al. (I prefer not to use urls in the references), the hyphenator (as the printed copies I have use 10 digit ISBNs, I don't see how it's required to "update" them), and I can't see the pages from the Glossa Ordinalia - Brill does not like me at all (or more correctly, Brill likes my money way too much... heh). Ealdgyth (talk) 18:49, 5 June 2022 (UTC)

Passing
All looks good now, passing the article. Regards, Amitchell125 (talk) 19:50, 5 June 2022 (UTC)