Talk:Roberto Landell de Moura

Copyright problem removed
Only one of the referenced links are now available E bruton (talk) 10:28, 29 October 2015 (UTC)

Prior content in this article duplicated one or more previously published sources. The material was copied from: http://www.landelldemoura.qsl.br/english.htm. Infringing material has been rewritten or removed and must not be restored, unless it is duly released under a compatible license. (For more information, please see "using copyrighted works from others" if you are not the copyright holder of this material, or "donating copyrighted materials" if you are.) For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or published material; such additions will be deleted. Contributors may use copyrighted publications as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences or phrases. Accordingly, the material may be rewritten, but only if it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with these policies. Thank you. Dpmuk (talk) 19:03, 16 December 2011 (UTC)

External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Landell de Moura. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070607060929/http://www.museudotelefone.org.br/landell.htm to http://www.museudotelefone.org.br/landell.htm

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot  (Report bug) 16:09, 16 December 2017 (UTC)

Hertz
I think Roberto read about some experiments made by Heinrich Hertz with the crookes tube that's why he included it on patents and such. Reading the patents and info I don't really know if he knew what he was doing, he seems to always end recurring to the "photophone" in his more detailed explanation. What I think he "invented" was a megaphone-photophone system, and later patented that spark wave generator wich apparently worked. The reports made by the magazines were probably related to the photophone and megaphone. Mirad1000 (talk) 04:52, 21 February 2023 (UTC)

Reposting of deleted text that was removed from main page
The following was removed from the main page on February 15, 2024. I am reposting it here because it appears to be a common opinion in Brazil, but more appropriate for the Talk page:

He had many technical and financial difficulties to develop his research, he worked most of the time alone and found a lot of resistance and disbelief on the part of authorities and the population, which prevented his recognition in life from being broader, but in certain spheres his stature scientific research was duly appreciated and it is known that he rejected opportunities to publicize its inventions. Thus, the popular idea that was formed around him as a persecuted, wronged and suffered scientist facing an insensitive and obscurantist world, is a partial truth. His biography still has many gaps and only part of his scientific legacy has been studied, with a lot of autograph documentation still to be explored. In any case, in Brazil he has already received a series of official honors and recognitions. He is honorary citizen of city of São Paulo, patron of Science, Technology and Innovation in the municipality of Porto Alegre, patron of Brazilian radio amateurs, and in 2012, by presidential decree, his name was inscribed in the  Tancredo Neves Pantheon of the Fatherland and Freedom 

--Reposted by Thomas H. White (talk) 14:08, 17 February 2024 (UTC)


 * It was removed because it is un-referenced, opinion, and does not summarize content in the body of the article (see MOS:LEAD). It may be true but the lead needs to follow the body and the body material requires references.


 * I have also removed these claims (again) to talk. We can not make claims about someone by trying to translate and interpret non-English primary sources. The claim in the lead, as written, is probably wrong since it combines the claim of "developing long-distance audio transmissions" with "radio signals". The body of the article (and the available sources) do not support this claim. de Moura at some point added, or described, a coherer based radio bell signal, not radio voice transmission. We have de Moura proposing using radio voice transmission in a patent completed before 1903 but there is no reference that he ever accomplished this and that date would be after Fessenden's 1900 voice transmission. Fountains of Bryn Mawr (talk) 20:26, 17 February 2024 (UTC)