Talk:RoboCop 3

Criticism Section NPOV problems
Excuse me, but the "criticism" section is by all means not NPOV. - Sikon 17:33, 25 September 2005 (UTC)

Agreed. This is an encyclopedia, not a movie review site. - --195.137.96.86 20:13, 18 October 2005 (UTC)

Yes, that I see... But... What is NPOV?

'Neutral Point of View'. See WP:NPOV. I've fixed it. Proto t c 09:46, 28 October 2005 (UTC)

"Film Noir meets the Blade Runner"? Did you write this yourself? Wasn't Blade Runner in a sort of film noir style? And just how exactly is a cyborg cop film noir? Dessydes 19:12, 8 May 2006 (UTC)

Who exactly criticised the film for not giving enough political philosophy to the neighbourhood people? I refuse to believe that any critic would be so pedantic on philosophy as that unless someone puts a reference up. Even then, the critic needs to be credited by name rather than having "some critics say".


 * As of now I am removing all criticism for a complete lack of citation. Criticism sections are really only for cited criticisms from large fan bases, industry professionals, or actual critics.--  Oni Ookami Alfador Talk 23:06, 13 February 2007 (UTC)

Ken Strong acting from the grave?
This movie lists Ken Strong as part of the cast, but he died in 1979. IMDb Profile Perhaps a different person?

Robocop 4
What proof is their that Robocop 4 was to be titles Fight for the future? I have never heard of this, and am a fairly avid Robo fan. While I have heard about Robocop 4 being considered I have never read anywhere where this title is mentioned, and this is the first time I have ever hear the name at all.
 * I'm wondering why this section is here at all. Seems like when it becomes a more solid reality, it should be its own article, not an out-of-place section of this one. Dstumme (talk) 14:59, 11 June 2008 (UTC)
 * RoboCop 4 on IMDb 5.90.189.153 (talk) 20:36, 18 November 2017 (UTC)

Critical Reception
I have added in a new critical reception section, its sourced as well as I could find. Also picked up some random refs for other bits of the article. Looks like the plot has been ripped vebartim from another site, can't remember which. Anyone seen this film recently and feel like writing another plot summary? I don't think I could bring myself to sit through it again even for the sake of Wikipedia. Nait2k4 (talk) 03:13, 13 January 2009 (UTC)

Fred Dekker has not directed another film since Robocop 3 which tells you everything you need to know about this movie. It should never have happened. --Incredible Cheeseburger (talk) 18:25, 22 May 2013 (UTC)

Plot
The first two movies articles had much longer, more detailed plot summaries. i feel that a few important things (eg: the recurring theme of the 4th prime directive) were missed. needs expansion, but i have only seen it once i didn't see all of it so im not realy the one to do it. XM8 Carbine (talk) 13:52, 19 September 2009 (UTC)