Talk:Robocode

NG
Something could be said about Robocode NG.

I think Robocode NG should have its own article. Then we can link it from this one. -- PEZ 15:23, 12 February 2006 (UTC)

Hundreds of lines, ha!
this line "Good robots have hundreds of lines in their code dedicated to strategy."

Actually the good robots have thousands, tens of thousands, to hundreds of thousands of lines of code now. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 69.95.70.191 (talk) 22:07, 21 January 2007 (UTC).


 * A good robot may only have 10 lines of code. If you think the number of lines of code make a better bot your doing it worng. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 193.120.222.4 (talk) 15:50, 28 November 2008 (UTC)


 * Well actually unless you are working on a nanobot, 10 lines is highly unlikely. In fact, 10 lines is even unlikely in nano's, they usually have around a hundred or so. The robots at the top of the main rankings in the rumbles have several thousand at least, even more for melee (many on many) battles. While I agree that robot efficiency and performance is not directly linked to the number of lines of code in a robot, there is a correlation on the lower side. So... in actuality, "additional lines of code make a better robot more likely". 108.202.198.50 (talk) 13:31, 2 October 2014 (UTC)

Fandom of "Some robots worth mentioning"
I found this quite interesting -- as per I'm the one who modified it to this latest version. As the Robocode community is none but a single, small and strong community which almost all robocoder who wish to lean about Robocode have to joined, and this all in this is generally accepted in Robocode community. I does sound biased from other POV, but it is perfectly neural I believed. --nat3738 (talk) 15:03, 15 April 2010 (UTC)