Talk:Robot Carnival

cleaning up the article
two points:

- I'd like to get rid of the comment: "The visual style of this segment was heavily influenced by the classic music video for A-Ha's "Take on Me". "

No citation was ever given and it sounds like a personal opinion.

- I think some of the plot summaries could be more detailed, and their format could be cleaner and more uniform. I could expand on them myself if no one objects. It would also be nice to give some info on it's availability, it's airing on the sci fi channels saturday morning anime block, and the current lack of a Region 1 DVD for the movie.

Phillosmaster 21:02, 12 January 2007 (UTC)


 * I'm cool what that. I think you might just want to add a "citation needed" for the Ah-Ha thing, but I agree that some of the plot summaries could be fleshed out 198.6.46.11 (talk) 17:21, 19 February 2008 (UTC)

Untitled Comment
Prequel to it yuu mean sakura wars....... that ! prequel!!!! —Preceding unsigned comment added by 205.188.116.66 (talk • contribs) 01:09, 2 July 2006

This film was not a sequel to anything. -- Jason Palpatine 01:33, 27 September 2006 (UTC) (speak your mind | contributions)

What made these stories so great is that they were all so raw and profound. 63.102.94.4 (talk) 14:20, 12 March 2008 (UTC) CDunn

A film?
People here and on ANN keep calling this a film, but everything in Japanese I've read (including the Japanese wiki) says it was an OVA. Was it shown in theaters? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 203.181.19.53 (talk) 11:29, 9 February 2009 (UTC)


 * If the bit in the article regarding Carl Macek is correct, the US release had its segments reordered to optimize the number of film reels on which it was distributed. So it is definitely a "film" -- as in "something that was shown on film".  This implies a theatrical release in the US, and IMDB seems to confirm this with release dates.  No release dates for Japan, though, so it's entirely possible that it was OVA there.  75.73.102.40 (talk) 22:39, 17 March 2010 (UTC)