Talk:Robotech (role-playing game)

Palladium
I note that the discussion of Palladium rules is fairly opinionated. I would suggest that describing the rules as "complex" without offering a standard for comparison, or citing complaints without a citation to accompany them is ridiculous. I challenge the initial authors to discover a published review or description that refers to the rules as "complex" and "time consuming" relative to other game systems. My own opinion might be that the rules were relatively streamlined and uncomplicated for play when compared to other games - but I'd never post such an opinion on page. Aderksen (talk) 01:29, 24 October 2008 (UTC)


 * I agree, there's several dismissive claims to the game series that certainly don't need to be here. 'Overly complicated', 'poorly suited', and 'clearly patterned off of AD&D', not to mention extra repetition of confusing rules.  This does not need to be an objective review. - Anonymous  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 67.129.231.194 (talk) 15:35, 24 August 2009 (UTC)


 * Removed the affore discussed rant and brought it here. It reads like someone that was confused by the game got frustrated, gave up, and used Wikipedia to whine about it; there's really nothing redeeming this:
 * 64.203.149.227 (talk) 15:59, 9 March 2012 (UTC)