Talk:Rocco Pantaleo

Untitled
I have reverted User:Mattinbgn's removal of the name of the victim. I don't understand his/her logic why it is non-notable. If we are going to mention the killing, we should mention the name of the victim. It is verifiable from the sources. Could they please state their reasons? --SJK (talk) 08:17, 29 March 2010 (UTC)
 * If the shooting is notable, then the name of the victim is notable. If the name of the victim is not notable, the shooting is not notable either. So I cannot understand User:Mattinbgn's logic that these two facts (that Rocco Pantaleo shot someone, and that the name of that person was Keith Lane) have distinct notability. Also, they reverted my edit with the comment "No, it is not. Take it to the talk page if you wish" -- even though I had already given my reasons on the Talk page, to which rather than responding they just went ahead and reverted. Ever heard of "practice what you preach"? --SJK (talk) 08:24, 30 March 2010 (UTC)