Talk:Rochelle Huppin

I am having trouble with this article I wrote on Rochelle Huppin. Please help me make the changes I need to make to this article so that it may meet Wikipedia guidelines. I feel the designations that were put on the page are not fair or accurate:

1) NOTABILITY REQUIREMENTS: it has been stated that these are not met. This person is an innovator, a woman in a man's field and she created something that did not exist prior. She built a successful business based on her idea and changed the way women (and men) in the Chef industry were able to do their work. Is that not notable? 2) EXCESSIVE AMOUNT OF INTRICATE DETAIL - I made edits after the article was first labeled this way. But it did not seem to matter. 3) CLOSE CONNECTION: I do not have a close connection to the subject, I'm a neighbor who dabbles in social media and I offered to write a page up for the subject. I made the admin ID in her name for my own easy-to-remember purposes. She did not write this but passed on info to me so I could piece together her story. 4) READS LIKE AN ADVERTISEMENT: I edited the article after this designation appeared. This, in connection to her company Chefwear. How do businesses (who may have been at the inception of a groundbreaking product) have a wiki page without automatically being designated an "advertisement?" 5) COPIED AND PASTED FROM A SOURCE. All background info came from the subject herself, I wrote it and it and was supported by publications and references on line.

Please help. I've made many edits after each point of contention but these did not affect the article's status. Any input would be greatly appreciated! Thank you for your assistance.

Rohup2011 (talk) 18:20, 10 October 2011 (UTC) Rosalind Robinson