Talk:Rock-It-Ball

NPOV Tag
I nominated this article to be checked for neutrality after seeing this request on a now inactive WikiProject. Thanks, Acather96 (talk) 15:05, 15 June 2010 (UTC)

I discussed this with Acather96 some time ago and he assured me he was happy with my explanation. Can the NPOV tag now be removed? 85.211.85.180 (talk) 10:53, 29 August 2011 (UTC)

Page protection

 * Heading added. ...Dynamic&#124;cimanyD... (talk&#124;klat) ☺ 02:21, 31 August 2011 (UTC)

this page has evidently been temporarily blocked. thank you so much - it is a small price for the community to pay for the page to be stable, objective, factual and accurate.

Pmhildreth (talk) 23:30, 30 August 2011 (UTC)
 * Pmhildreth, as an autoconfirmed user, you can still edit the page. Semi-protection only applies to unregistered/new users. Also, the protection will expire automatically in about 2 weeks (see here for when exactly), so it would still be a good idea to keep an eye on it. ...Dynamic&#124;cimanyD... (talk&#124;klat) ☺ 02:21, 31 August 2011 (UTC)

.

Thank you. We have continued to monitor this page and to maintain it. We have always striven to keep it accurate, factual and up to date. However the same individual who was causing the problems as last year has resurfaced and is doing the same things as before. We could undo the edits as before however this would only result in another edit war which we clearly wish to avoid. I have posted an editor advice request to see how we might deal with this situation. Pmhildreth (talk) 21:38, 1 September 2012 (UTC)

removing POV tag with no active discussion per Template:POV
I've removed an old neutrality tag from this page that appears to have no active discussion per the instructions at Template:POV:
 * This template is not meant to be a permanent resident on any article. Remove this template whenever:
 * There is consensus on the talkpage or the NPOV Noticeboard that the issue has been resolved
 * It is not clear what the neutrality issue is, and no satisfactory explanation has been given
 * In the absence of any discussion, or if the discussion has become dormant.

Since there's no evidence of ongoing discussion, I'm removing the tag for now. If discussion is continuing and I've failed to see it, however, please feel free to restore the template and continue to address the issues. Thanks to everybody working on this one! -- Khazar2 (talk) 13:17, 9 July 2013 (UTC)