Talk:Rock Mass Rating system

Cleannup needed
The opening paragraph should be one or two lines saying what the RMR is and what it is used for. Is it used for determining how much reinforcement to use? That seems to be be implied further down, but it's not completely clear that that's the case. Either way, what else, if anything, is it used for?

Bieniawski is at the moment the main focus. His creating the system should either be moved down and given his own paragraph, only be reworded so that he is mentioned in passing rather than being the whole of the lead sentance.

The relationship between RMR and 'Geomechanics Classification' needs to be made clear. Are they the same thing, or does one feed into the other, or what?

Most of the gramma and speeling errors have been fixed (thanks Ideogram) but there are still bits that need to be put into the encyclopedic voice (eg "is used" instead of "we can use" and so on).

The stuff about fuzzy logic is bordering on speculation, as written. If this has been done, we should talk about that. If it hasn't, then it's OR.

So this is a good start, but there's still more to be done.

Lastly, the German page has some weblinks that might be useful to look at and/or reference.

Regards, Ben Aveling 21:50, 22 November 2006 (UTC)
 * I think the best bet would be an actual translation of the German article. Mackensen (talk) 16:21, 27 November 2006 (UTC)