Talk:Rock Sound

Fair use rationale for Image:Rsuk95 cover.jpg
Image:Rsuk95 cover.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 10:30, 6 June 2007 (UTC)

Neutrality dispute
Thsi article seems to praise the magazine a little more than it should Djskein79 (talk) 18:27, 7 March 2008 (UTC)

Agreed. Unless the article can come up with some serious citations for its claims, most of it should be deleted. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 209.212.80.94 (talk) 18:14, 8 August 2008 (UTC)

Hardly covers indie rock?
I would disagree completely with this statement. It doesn't cover indie rock now, but in it's early days (circa 1999 - 2006) it previewed many indie bands (Remy Zero, Kent, Vega 4 etc) as they had tracks on the free CD. It's how I got into these bands in the first place. The joy of all things (talk) 16:21, 21 January 2016 (UTC)