Talk:Rocket Lake

Notability
User:Kj cheetham, there's sources out there, so curious why you would nom? Widefox ; talk 09:23, 20 July 2020 (UTC)


 * Looking at things more carefully today, I'd have withdrawn the nom myself anyway to be honest. -Kj cheetham (talk) 09:29, 20 July 2020 (UTC)


 * It is irresponsible to list "The Rocket Lake cores contain significantly more transistors than current Skylake-derived Comet Lake cores" when no sources are cited and Intel doesn't release transistor counts. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 40.133.174.198 (talk) 07:28, 23 December 2020 (UTC)

Unscrupulous link suspected
The edition from 02:16, December 20, 2020‎ by 85.249.193.21 added a meaningless line after article content with a link to third party website that looks suspicious, possibly promotional or fishing. I'm not an editor so I don't know how to properly remove or hide it but I wanted to raise editors' attention to this. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Avatar(DS) (talk • contribs) 21:35, 27 December 2020 (UTC)
 * I reverted this 24 December 2020 edit by 103.104.114.71 which looks like EXT spam. Widefox ; talk 16:42, 21 February 2021 (UTC)

Addressing Meltdown/Spectre
Does anyone know if Intel has finally managed to fully address in hardware the various Meltdown/Spectre variants? This would be a good category to tag against all the older "Lakes" as well as this one and any new ones until they finally get it right. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.156.255.250 (talk) 02:08, 19 March 2021 (UTC)
 * Spectre class vulnerabilities are impossible to fix in HW, Meltdown has been fixed for several generations already. Also check Transient execution CPU vulnerabilities Artem S. Tashkinov (talk) 11:18, 19 March 2021 (UTC)