Talk:Rod Kanehl

Untitled
Why is he only "regarded as" the first Met to hit a grand slam? Is this qualifier here because he is generally claimed to have been the first, but there's someone else who really is the first; because he is the first recorded Met to do so but there might be others before him who aren't; or what? Please clarify. --Kelly Martin 05:21, 31 Dec 2004 (UTC)