Talk:Rodrigue Tremblay

Untitled
This article might have been written by Tremblay himself or an admirer. Although the works of Tremblay are considerable and well-respected, the neutrality of the article should be double-checked.

I've removed sentences that were clearly boasting and fixed the info box. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 74.56.154.152 (talk) 14:40, 27 June 2008 (UTC)

The article still doesn't adhere to a neutral point of view. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 74.59.237.152 (talk) 03:39, 26 March 2014 (UTC)

Assessment comment
Substituted at 04:47, 30 April 2016 (UTC)

Reference style
I added the tag, since some text appears to have been copied from another location that used another referencing system, or uses an ad-hoc numbering system. There is a reflist, but that is also unconventional and is not numbered, meaning that anyone who will clean this mess will need to do a lot of work to conciliate them... — Paleo Neonate  – 19:24, 11 July 2021 (UTC)

Global Research
It is mentioned in the article but it is unclear if it really is the conspiracy theories and foreign propaganda Canadian website. The text match is how I found this article, — Paleo Neonate  – 19:27, 11 July 2021 (UTC)