Talk:Roger Rosenblatt

Why?
I will try to contribute a little something to this entry after being touched by the piece Mr Rosenblatt wrote in the New Yorker, 15/12/08. -The Gnome (talk) 08:52, 27 December 2008 (UTC)

Objectivity?
This page borders on obsequious in its treatment of Roger Rosenblatt. I suggest it be revised for objectivity. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 76.179.109.125 (talk) 07:25, 8 February 2012 (UTC)


 * agree! 2601:14D:4E80:C840:9C38:8604:A694:897D (talk) 00:30, 17 July 2024 (UTC)

A Letter to the Year 2100
I stumbled across my January 1, 2000 commemorative issue of TIME, and had a blast reading the essay “A Letter to the Year 2100” by him. MYaybe we should give that a mention for the year 2100's Wikipedia readers.--Varkman (talk) 19:23, 15 January 2016 (UTC)

NYT article
I feel sorry for how you view getting old. You must see your world as a dangerous place when it is in fact a place of opportunity and joy. Think positive and see the good thing in your life. 2601:345:8301:C870:A403:1D20:84F1:F4D5 (talk) 00:54, 6 October 2023 (UTC)

autobiography
This article is evidently an essay written entirely by the subject. It does not adhere to the usual bio entries on this site and appears to have access to personally experienced events Mandlfme (talk) 22:14, 30 April 2024 (UTC)