Talk:Roger Steare

Suggestions
— Preceding unsigned comment added by Chiswick Chap (talk • contribs)
 * 1) wikify
 * 2) de-peacock

Declaration of interest
I own Reach Further, a social learning consultancy, helping Roger Steare with his digital profile.

My team (Luke Beaumont and Bryony Taylor) are trying our best to make this article neutral, how can we improve it?

Liz Cable Lizcable (talk) 10:17, 17 December 2011 (UTC)


 * I'm Bryony Taylor I work with Liz Cable for Roger Steare. We appreciate any help you can give us in editing this article. Bryony Taylor (talk) 10:32, 17 December 2011 (UTC)


 * I'll declare an interest, too, as I'm about to provide some consultancy to Reach Further. I've therefore restricted my edits to formatting and linking. However, I would point out that the article was created via the article wizard and was reviewed by an independent and uninvolved member of WikiProject Articles for creation before publication. Additions since then have been relatively minor. No specific issues requiring attention have been identified, and I think (as an editor of long-standing) the article should therefore be de-tagged.  Andy Mabbett ( Pigsonthewing ); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 11:34, 17 December 2011 (UTC)


 * I'm declaring my interest too, Luke Beaumont, I work for Reach Further. Lukeb3000 (talk) 12:31, 18 December 2011 (UTC)
 * Let me know if any of you need an independent third party to review any potentially contentious edit. I'll keep an eye on this article.--v/r - TP 19:37, 19 December 2011 (UTC)

COI tag removed
I have no COI; I've reviewed this article and it appears to me to be a neutral presentation of (for the most part) well referenced information. I see no reason for a COI tag on the article page. In my understanding the COI tag is used where there are issues with the page arising out of COI, not merely that article authors have COI. Should any COI related issues be discovered, then by all means re-apply the tag; or, more usefully, fix the issues. --Tagishsimon (talk) 23:43, 18 December 2011 (UTC)

Additional material
Further to the above I'm now doing some work for Roger, and he's asked me to add some (well-cited, factual) info to the article. I will notify TP and Tagishsimon when I have done so. I also invite others to scrutinise my edits. Andy Mabbett ( Pigsonthewing ); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 17:20, 6 August 2012 (UTC)
 * Now done; . Andy Mabbett ( Pigsonthewing ); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 18:35, 6 August 2012 (UTC)
 * I've made . Andy Mabbett ( Pigsonthewing ); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 20:45, 10 May 2015 (UTC)
 * .... Andy Mabbett ( Pigsonthewing ); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 13:50, 21 April 2018 (UTC)
 * Noted. I'm painting stuff right now; I'll do a review this evening. --Tagishsimon (talk) 14:30, 21 April 2018 (UTC)
 * Seems NPOV and germane to the q. of what is a corporate philosopher. --Tagishsimon (talk) 22:42, 21 April 2018 (UTC)
 * , thanks; and, when I forgot to ping you. Andy Mabbett ( Pigsonthewing ); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 19:08, 18 September 2020 (UTC)
 * It's starting to come off as promotional. Mentioning every time his name comes up in the news appears to be a list of accomplishments, like how a resume would read.  For example, what was the significance to his life that he was profiled in Financial Times?  If there was something in that profile worthwhile, why isn't that something mentioned instead?--v/r - TP 17:54, 8 October 2020 (UTC)