Talk:Rogers City, Michigan

Need a climate section
I was just to the article on Cadillac, Michigan and note that they have a section that looks this this. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 7&6=thirteen (talk • contribs) 20:27, 2 January 2008 (UTC)

Climate
Cadillac experiences a typical northern Michigan climate, undergoing temperate seasonal changes, influenced by the presence of Lake Michigan and the inevitable lake effect. Winters are generally cold with large amounts of snowfall. Summers are warm. The average high temperature in July is 79 °F (26 °C) and the average low is in January, at 10 °F (-12 °C). Summer temperatures can exceed 90 °F (32 °C), and winter temperatures can drop below 0 °F (-18 °C). Average annual rainfall is 32 inches (81 cm), and average annual snowfall is 71 inches (180 cm). Snowfall typically occurs between the months of November and March.

I 've never done one of these. Is there somebody out there who can help. 7&amp;6=thirteen (talk) 21:05, 2 January 2008 (UTC)Stan

Cityscape and Historic Landmarks
Dear fellow Rogers City/Michigan Wikipedians:

While I'm non the subject of Cadillac, Michigan, I note that they have two subsections in their article that would really fit into the Rogers City, Michigan article.

They are

Cityscape
and

Historic Landmarks
It would be helpful if someone familiar with the lay of the land could do narrative sections like they did in Cadillac, Michigan.

Just a gentle suggestion and a request for assistance. Thanks

Removal of reference to Catholic diocese
Dear Anonymous:

Welcome to Wikipedia.

I notice that you have removed the statement and reference that Charlevoix, Michigan (and 30 other locales is part of the Gaylord diocese of the Catholic Church.

Your systematic removal of the accurate relationship of the geographic organization of the Catholic church in Michigan form a bunch of websites under the theory that "it has nothing to do with geography" is wrong-headed. If you narrowly construe the word "geography", you were still removing a pertinent, true and useful fact. It would have been far better (IMHO), if you had expended all this destructive energy in a constructive manner, i.e., moving the thought or reforming it into a message that would be of use to the readers while leaving the information there in one form or another.

Of course, maybe it is that you have a different agenda.

7&amp;6=thirteen (talk) 05:44, 11 March 2008 (UTC) Stan

7&amp;6=thirteen (talk) 22:41, 2 January 2008 (UTC)Stan