Talk:Rohingyalish

Merger
This article and Rohingya language both address the same topic, although from different perspective (this from History, the other from linguistics) How about merging them in a single article? --Ragib 18:45, 19 Jun 2005 (UTC)
 * I agree with Ragib that these should be merged. Friejose 14:14, 12 August 2005 (UTC)
 * Agreed. --Mel Etitis ( &Mu;&epsilon;&lambda; &Epsilon;&tau;&eta;&tau;&eta;&sigmaf; ) 14:02, 13 August 2005 (UTC)

Ok, I have merged it to Rohingya language and made a redirect from Rohingyalish to Rohingya language. --Ragib 01:21, 14 August 2005 (UTC)

History and Linguistic
I think it is better left History part separate from Linguistic because many may add more content to the History part while Linguistic part should be dedicated to specialized people only. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 212.138.64.174 (talk • contribs) 15:35 Jun 26 2005 UTC


 * Well, the history can easily be put into the History section. I still do not understand why the linguistics part need to be in a different article ... its a single language, and the language article seems quite disconnected with the history article. --Ragib 15:41, 26 Jun 2005 (UTC)


 * I am proposing to move the contents of this article to the "History" section of Rohingya language, and have a redirect from "Rohingyalish" to Rohingya language. How about that? --Ragib 19:07, 9 August 2005 (UTC)