Talk:Rokomari.com

Controversy section dictates overall slant of article
The controversy section of the English Wikipedia article needs checking for issues of bias. It is notable that the original article in Bangla is more focused on information on the website, and functions better as an example of a Wikipedia article. The English article however, is overshadowed by focus on the issue of controversy, something which gives an overall negative focus on the topic. I would encourage editors on working on this stub-class article to present a more enriched and balanced view. -- ~Mohammad Hossain~  09:11, 11 December 2021 (UTC)


 * It is not the duty of Wikipedia to give either positive or negative overview of a topic i.e., taking side, rather to put factual data for its users. I think your emphasis on so called "positive" should need a check on bias, retrospectively. It is obvious that rokomari.com stand and continue to do so against freedom of speech while selling controversial islamists books. That piece of information is the sole reason why this page has been edited (vandalized) so many times. Yes, I can edit it again but for what end ? Regression on Wikipedia is evident, and this article (rokomari.com) with so many other is the proof of that. goodluck with your white washing of facts for the sake of "positivity". Uthsab (talk) 16:40, 17 August 2022 (UTC)

A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion
The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion: Participate in the deletion discussion at the. —Community Tech bot (talk) 22:07, 14 January 2022 (UTC)
 * Rokomari.com Logo.svg