Talk:Roman Catholic Archdiocese of San Francisco

Archbishop Montgomery
While I agree that Archbishop Montgomery should be mentioned on this page, he was not an Auxiliary Bishop and thus should not be on that list (at least without clarification). He was actually the Coadjutor Archbishop. He never succeeded to become Archbishop because he died before Archbishop Riordan.--Dcheney (talk) 02:48, 20 October 2014 (UTC)
 * I have adjusted the section. Elizium23 (talk) 02:54, 20 October 2014 (UTC)

In 2016, I anonymously noted that 2 bishops of this diocese had been coadjutors. THAT information was placed alongside the respective entries in the bishop-of-the-diocese list. The "coadjutor & auxiliaries" list has a note about that as well. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 167.102.56.186 (talk) 20:19, 11 October 2016 (UTC)

Ordinaries Section
It seems odd to have auxiliary and coadjutor bishops listed under a section titled Ordinaries, since by definition, auxiliary and coadjutor bishops are NOT ordinaries!--Dcheney (talk) 16:32, 24 November 2014 (UTC)

I am still doing anonymous editing, and changed this heading to "Bishops". Also, I have added other priests of this diocese who became bishops, in line with what the catholic-hierarchy site does. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 167.102.56.186 (talk) 20:16, 11 October 2016 (UTC)

Source for "Other priests of this diocese who became bishops"
I have put that section back in. I used the catholic-hierarchy site for this information. For each diocese, it lists affiliated bishops, and it includes some who were not bishop of the diocese OR coadjutor OR auxiliary; it includes a bishop who served any part of his priesthood in that diocese, even if it was not as a bishop. OK?? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 167.102.56.186 (talk) 20:14, 11 October 2016 (UTC)

External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Roman Catholic Archdiocese of San Francisco. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
 * Added tag to http://www.catholicnews.com/data/stories/cns/1203179.htm
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20050320050109/http://www.sfarchdiocese.org/cathedral.html to http://www.sfarchdiocese.org/cathedral.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot  (Report bug) 13:44, 24 May 2017 (UTC)

Use of Profit/Loss for Population
At first glance, the use of the Profit/Loss indicators suggests things that just aren't true. In particular, the Loss marker before 24.5% strongly suggests that the Catholic population is down by 24.5% - which is not true - it is more like 6%.--Dcheney (talk) 01:53, 27 August 2017 (UTC)