Talk:Roman Catholic Diocese of Plymouth

Child protection official has been caught with 4,000 pictures of child porn
"A child protection official for the Catholic Church has been caught with 4,000 pictures of child porn. ... Married Jarvis, 49, a former social worker, was employed by the church following sex scandals about pervert priests. His job was to monitor church groups to ensure paedophiles did not gain access to children in the church’s congregations. ...He admitted 12 counts of making, ­possessing and distributing indecent ­images...Jarvis, who has been sacked from his job as child safeguarding ­officer, worked the Diocese of ­Plymouth for nine years."


 * Church child protection chief caught with 4,000 child porn pictures mirror.co.uk.--91.39.113.246 (talk) 21:06, 2 August 2011 (UTC)

External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Roman Catholic Diocese of Plymouth. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070905160556/http://www.plymouthcathedral.org.uk/ to http://www.plymouthcathedral.org.uk/

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot  (Report bug) 16:55, 8 December 2017 (UTC)

"Did not take effect?"
We would like to know what it signifies when your database indicates "Did not take effect", in this case the coadjutor "Father James Moor". From the heading, we would infer that he was not ordained a bishop and possibly died before the ceremony. It could also mean that he was installed as coadjutor but never succeeded the ordinary. Could you clarify for us? Does it mean the same thing everywhere it is noted? Elizium23 (talk) 18:04, 11 January 2021 (UTC)
 * In this case, according to Annuaire Pontifical Catholique, 1916, p391: "refuse et non sacre" (refused and not consecrated). If it applies to "selected" then it normally means Papal confirmation was denied. It is also used in cases where an appointment is made after the candidate's death (before the news of the death has reached Rome). Dcheney (talk) 20:37, 11 January 2021 (UTC)

WP:NOT a directory
According to consensus, Wikipedia is not a directory applies to exhaustive lists of parishes and schools within the diocesan articles. If you wish to create a well-sourced standalone article of a notable topic such as the schools in a given diocese, we would not object to its existence. But because of the non-notability of the vast majority of parishes such as you have added to this article, exhaustive lists are not suitable and WP:UNDUE for inclusion in this type of article. Elizium23 (talk) 20:39, 11 January 2021 (UTC)


 * Fair enough. I won't go around taking down lists elsewhere (I think somewhere between 1/3 and 1/2 of Church of England diocese articles have a church list, also many counties and London boroughs), but I won't object if you decide to. Mark J (talk) 21:17, 11 January 2021 (UTC)
 * , I only work in Roman Catholic topics, and this is, for the time being, more or less a local consensus. So while I weakly disagree, I won't impinge on the decisions of these other editors to list parishes. Thanks for letting me know. Elizium23 (talk) 21:27, 11 January 2021 (UTC)
 * No worries - useful to know the consensus at least in the R. C. world. Thanks. Mark J (talk) 21:48, 11 January 2021 (UTC)