Talk:Roman Catholic Diocese of Sarsina

Tagged: citation style
I have tagged this article for its unfortunate abuse of tags as notes. References should be citations to reliable secondary sources, which this article markedly lacks. Footnotes are made with a different format. The difference should be distinguished here. Elizium23 (talk) 03:17, 12 December 2020 (UTC)
 * I have restored the tag and the WP:NPOV fixes which I placed in the article at the same time. If insists on using faulty "citation" styles then he will have to live with the maintenance tag. Elizium23 (talk) 06:24, 12 December 2020 (UTC)
 * I am happy to live with the tag, if only you will not delete corrections and valid material. I also invite you to find other reliable secondary sources than the ones that I cited frequently. Saying that the article "markedly lacks" reliable secondary sources is incorrect and insulting. --Vicedomino (talk) 06:48, 12 December 2020 (UTC)