Talk:Roman Emperor (Dominate)

Whole page needs reworking & rewriting
This entire page has serious issues. Is it meant to be an examination of the constitutional status of emperors post-Diocletian? Or just a list of emperors and their dynastic relations? The initial paragraph, despite reading like Edward Gibbon, indicated the former - yet the body of the article is more a very confused treatment of the latter. The article doesn't currently do anything useful. I think what would be much more sensible would be to create a page about the constitutional status of Roman emperors, and how that changed over time, rather than this unreadable hodgepodge. 93.97.193.226 (talk) 22:24, 13 March 2010 (UTC)
 * Agree totally Rjdeadly (talk) 19:14, 9 September 2019 (UTC)