Talk:Roman Moiseyev

Copyright problem removed
One or more portions of this article duplicated other source(s). Infringing material has been rewritten or removed and must not be restored, unless it is duly released under a compatible license. (For more information, please see "using copyrighted works from others" if you are not the copyright holder of this material, or "donating copyrighted materials" if you are.) For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or published material; such additions will be deleted. Contributors may use copyrighted publications as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences or phrases. Accordingly, the material may be rewritten, but only if it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with these policies. Thank you. --Moonriddengirl (talk) 10:55, 14 October 2009 (UTC)

This is my material for me (http://www.musiciansnetwork.com/network/Bands_and_Artists/M/Roman_Y__Moiseyev__conductor-info101899.html), I have published —Preceding unsigned comment added by 77.243.99.206 (talk) 11:15, 14 October 2009 (UTC)
 * Let me know if yo need help with the verification process. Until the material is verified, it can't be used. --Moonriddengirl (talk) 11:22, 14 October 2009 (UTC)

Yes, help me —Preceding unsigned comment added by 77.243.99.206 (talk) 11:27, 14 October 2009 (UTC)


 * All right. If it is your website, it will be quite easy to verify. All you need to do is restore the material that is currently archived and place a notice on it indicating the proper license. A good statement might read:

"The text of this website (or page, if you are specifically releasing one section) is available for modification and reuse under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Sharealike 3.0 Unported License and the GNU Free Documentation License (unversioned, with no invariant sections, front-cover texts, or back-cover texts)."
 * It's important that you specify these licenses and also that you understand what these licenses mean. Text placed on Wikipedia can be modified by anyone and reused by anyone, even commercially, but reusers cannot try to assert a copyright over the material--that is, they can't stop others from using the same license. Modifications will not be attributed to you, but you will be given attribution for your contribution.


 * If it is not your website, the matter becomes a little more complicated, though not impossible. Please let me know if you need additional directions. --Moonriddengirl (talk) 11:40, 14 October 2009 (UTC)

My site www.roman-moiseyev.narod.ru, link to the site http://www.musiciansnetwork.com/network/Bands_and_Artists/M/Roman_Y__Moiseyev__conductor-info101899.html published by me —Preceding unsigned comment added by 77.243.99.206 (talk) 12:04, 14 October 2009 (UTC)


 * I'll look through their website to see if they disavow rights to the material they publish. If they do, and the material is also published on your site, then such a statement there would be sufficient. Otherwise, a few more steps may be necessary. I'll go look, but I will note in the meantime that if we can't verify, we also have the option of simply rewriting the material. Some of the material would be no problem as it is. Dates and job titles are not copyright protected speech. It is the sentences and phrases like "Improved his mastery under the guidance of Professor Gennady Rozhdestvensky." that we cannot use as they are without permission. I'll also note, though, that even if copyright is cleared, the material is not likely to stay as it is. At the bottom of every edit screen, it says, "If you do not want your writing to be edited, used, and redistributed at will, then do not submit it here." This is also covered at Conflict of interest. Wikipedia's articles can be edited by anyone and generally are. --Moonriddengirl (talk) 12:12, 14 October 2009 (UTC)
 * Okay. It seems that original publication can be traced to www.roman-moiseyev.narod.ru. So far as I can see, the document being duplicated no longer exists there (the current resume is slightly different). But the steps above will work at your website. If you restore the document there and place a notice on it or if you generally release the contents of the website, then the material can be placed on Wikipedia for modification and reuse by its contributors. The statement above works for either purpose. If you wish to release only that page, you should either put the statement on that page or put it elsewhere with a direct link to that page. Either way, please leave a note here when you have done so. --Moonriddengirl (talk) 12:21, 14 October 2009 (UTC)

www.roman-moiseyev.narod.ru/2-3.pdf —Preceding unsigned comment added by 77.243.99.206 (talk) 12:38, 14 October 2009 (UTC)


 * I've followed the link to, but I don't see a licensing statement. It is also not the same as the material that has been being placed here. You could license that, but I will note that we would not be able to use some of that text--for instance, the material regarding "valuable qualities" would need a source not connected to the article's subject. --Moonriddengirl (talk)

What is the licensings the statement--77.243.99.206 (talk) 13:36, 14 October 2009 (UTC)
 * Please stop blanking this page. You've been advised that you are not supposed to. In this case, there's a good example why. The licensing statement is above, in note of 11:40, 14 October 2009. --Moonriddengirl (talk) 13:58, 14 October 2009 (UTC)