Talk:Romania/GA6

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

Reviewer: FriyMan (talk · contribs) 18:26, 5 March 2017 (UTC)

I, FriyMan am reviewing this article. I will make the improvements, in case they are needed.

Comment from Ritchie333

 * This review should not have passed. There are far too many unsourced ends of sentences and tags in the article, which fails criteria 2b immediately. I have reverted the status on the talk page. Ritchie333 (talk)  (cont)  14:59, 20 March 2017 (UTC)
 * As a follow-up to Ritchie333, the article was nominated with a great many "citation needed" templates still active, nearly all of which are still in the article, and was nominated by a new editor to the article who had made three edits (one a reversion) prior to nominating yet without asking the regular editors for their assessment as per WP:GANI. That many "citation needed" templates is grounds for a quickfail per the GA criteria, so I believe Ritchie333 has done the right thing in reverting the above review's passage and failing it instead, since it should have been failed under 2b, or at the absolute minimum put on hold for those sourcing issues to have been fixed. There may well have been other issues. Unfortunately, in his first review, FriyMan did not do an adequate job; I recommend that he gain quite a bit more experience at Wikipedia, and nominate one of his own articles for GA and experience the process from the other side before attempting any further GA reviews. BlueMoonset (talk) 17:44, 20 March 2017 (UTC)