Talk:Romanian Treasure

Missing section
I have deleted the second reference as it no longer linked to what it claimed it would.

Russian Backstabers
Russians were always a bunch of backstabers and cannot be trusted to this day! —Preceding unsigned comment added by 85.120.204.213 (talk) 19:12, 12 August 2008 (UTC)

content of article.
In the end of the first paragraph of the article, please leave the wording as "It was never returned." rather than "It was never returned in totality". That is because if you say it was never returned in totality it is implied that it was returned in its larger part. However, it's exactly the opposite: it was returned just a very small part of it, much closer to nothing than to totality. Please reflect and leave the formulation as suggested.

Thank you. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 62.88.15.105 (talk) 21:04, 4 December 2010 (UTC)
 * Most was returned, except the National Bank's gold. There's no reason to ignore the fact that the most culturally valuable part of the treasure was returned (BTW the article doesn't mention the large 1956 transport).Anonimu (talk) 23:34, 4 December 2010 (UTC)

No, 40 carriages out of 42 were NEVER returned! How does that count for "most was returned" in your opinion?! —Preceding unsigned comment added by 92.83.253.56 (talk) 20:26, 4 January 2011 (UTC)