Talk:Romano-Gothic

Shortening
The external links on the bottom of the page go to links that give referneces for this article. The tag at the top of the page is not needed. --Lucius Sempronius Turpio (talk) 06:36, 15 July 2009 (UTC)

May I ask why the article is shortened so much?? Text with grammar errors seems better than no text. And if so please correct text instead of delete it (including the images)! --Black Orchid (talk) 13:39, 15 June 2011 (UTC)
 * Most of the article was nearly if not wholly ununderstandable (so how to correct?). It also contained complete descriptions of monuments which already have separate articles here, it had a restricted perspective (mostly only Germany and Netherlands. Why?). The transition phase between Romanesque (not Roman as it was written in the previous version!!!) is something very wide, which needs a more thoroughly analysis than those casually placed copies from other articles. In a (hope not too far) day, I'm going to add detailed articles on geographical and temporal faces of Gothic and Romanesque architecture, and perhaps at the time I'll also devote to this one. Anyway help is always welcome. Ciao and good work. --&#39;&#39;&#39;Attilios&#39;&#39;&#39; (talk) 13:59, 15 June 2011 (UTC)
 * Ok, I got the point, when I have got more time I will also try to set up a more/better article, need to read some articles/books to be able to do so. Most info I read was about the dutch and german perspective --Black Orchid (talk) 16:08, 22 June 2011 (UTC)