Talk:Rome Italy Temple

Controversy
The Controversy section doesn't seem to mention any "controversy". Is it just me, or is the proximity of another country/church a non-issue? And what does mutual non-recognition of baptisms have to do with this building? If there is a controversy, it needs to be spelled out more clearly, if there's no controversy the section should be removed. The only reference in the section is a dead link to a news story from 2001, long before this temple was announced. –  j ak s mata  14:57, 9 December 2009 (UTC)


 * I removed the dead link, and tagged the section for having no references. I found what I think is the same article that was being a source here, but it does not mention the temple, the controversy, or strained relations. The only thing it mentions is the cooperation with Catholic charities, but since the article is from 2001, you can't say that they "continue to work [together]".
 * If anything, the source article confirms that there is no controversy, rather than there being one. –  j ak s mata  14:55, 18 December 2009 (UTC)

I agree with the above. As far as what can be found on official websites of both Mormons or Catholics or from the media, there is no evident controversy. I would eliminate this section as well. Fdlillo (talk) 14:25, 30 June 2010 (UTC)

External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to 1 one external link on Rome Italy Temple. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/20090521100222/http://www.acerson.com:80/temple to http://www.acerson.com/temple

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

Cheers.—cyberbot II  Talk to my owner :Online 13:39, 25 January 2016 (UTC)