Talk:Romeo & Juliet: Sealed with a Kiss/GA2

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

Reviewer: Mediran (talk · contribs) 02:30, 24 August 2013 (UTC) I will review. :)

Review coming soon.

Review

 * Infobox -- Good
 * BTW, change start date to film date per WP:FILMRELEASE


 * Lead
 * "Romeo & Juliet: Sealed with a Kiss is a 2006 animated family fantasy film loosely following..." You need to specify that the film is an American production. I would suggest "Romeo & Juliet: Sealed with a Kiss is a 2006 American animated family fantasy film loosely following..."
 * ✅ 和DITOR  E tails 04:29, 24 August 2013 (UTC)


 * Plot
 * "but warns them that they will be in big trouble if Prince finds out." Is this a name? or some title for monarch weirdos? Well I know this is a title but just to be sure.
 * Fixed it 和DITOR  E tails 04:29, 24 August 2013 (UTC)
 * Again for "Prince, jealous of Juliet's affection for Romeo..."
 * Fixed it 和DITOR  E tails 04:29, 24 August 2013 (UTC)
 * And "and Prince finds a new mate..."
 * Fixed it 和DITOR  E tails 04:29, 24 August 2013 (UTC)

BTW, the article is very pleasant and it is such a very good little article. Thanks EditorE-- Great work! Mediran ( t  •  c ) 03:46, 24 August 2013 (UTC)
 * Voice cast
 * I would suggest to rename the section to "Cast and characters" or to something else. Since the section also discusses what the characters are. If you think it's OK now, don't change it around.
 * ✅ 和DITOR  E tails 04:29, 24 August 2013 (UTC)
 * Nibbelink as The Prince. Firstly, the t in "The Prince" should not be capitalized.
 * Why Nibbelink's first name not here? As for the previous review, the "surname only" is necessary to make it more encyclopedic but this is only for paragraphs I think. "Phil" should be added here.
 * First name added, so ✅ 和DITOR  E tails 04:29, 24 August 2013 (UTC)
 * Release
 * Section "Theater" rename to "Theatrical release"?
 * ✅ 和DITOR  E tails 04:29, 24 August 2013 (UTC)
 * Was the film rated by the MPAA? If yes, please add their rating. If not, leave it as is. But I'm sure it was rated of course.
 * Appearently not, according to this search. 和DITOR  E tails 04:29, 24 August 2013 (UTC)
 * See here. American films cannot be released without an MPAA review/rating.
 * Added. 和DITOR  E tails 12:36, 24 August 2013 (UTC)
 * Critical reception
 * Link "Hannah-Barbera" and "Cartoon Network" for those people who're not familiar with (like me).
 * ✅ 和DITOR  E tails 04:29, 24 August 2013 (UTC)
 * I think the review from LA Weekly is available at Wayback Machine. Link their review for clarification and verification.
 * ✅ 和DITOR  E tails 04:29, 24 August 2013 (UTC)
 * According to the interview with Animated Views, Nibbelink won two awards. He said "I won first place in the animation category and Best in Show, so I got two awards." Please add this.
 * ✅ 和DITOR  E tails 04:29, 24 August 2013 (UTC)
 * References
 * Ref 7 with "skwigly.co.uk". I would suggest to change it to "Skwigly" and italicize it because it's an online magazine.
 * ✅ 和DITOR  E tails 04:29, 24 August 2013 (UTC)
 * Ref 8 change the "indiantelevision.com" to "Indian Television"
 * ✅ 和DITOR  E tails 04:29, 24 August 2013 (UTC)
 * Ref 9 and 10... change the "hemeroteca.abc.es" to "ABC" and italicize it because it is a Spanich local newspaper. (See ABC)
 * ✅ 和DITOR  E tails 04:29, 24 August 2013 (UTC)

Sorry about the delay. Well congratulations! All of my comments above, and the comments from the previous GA review seems have been addressed. I think this article is all good to go. What a little nice article. Thank you very much for the improvements you did. Indeed, very good work EditorE-- well done! Mediran ( t  •  c ) 13:50, 24 August 2013 (UTC)
 * Final thoughts