Talk:Romeo Void/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

Reviewer: Jezhotwells (talk) 23:19, 20 March 2011 (UTC)

I shall be reviewing this article against the Good Article criteria, following its nomination for Good Article status.

Disambiguations: none found.

Linkrot: none found. Jezhotwells (talk) 23:20, 20 March 2011 (UTC)

Checking against GA criteria

 * GA review (see here for criteria)


 * 1) It is reasonably well written.
 * a (prose): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):
 * and a cover of Danish musician Jørgen Ingmann's popular instrumental song " Apache", "instrumental" or "track" would be better here, it is clearly not a "song".
 * Suitably compliant with MoS
 * 1) It is factually accurate and verifiable.
 * a (references): b (citations to reliable sources):  c (OR):
 * Well referenced, sources appear to be RS, no OR
 * 1) It is broad in its coverage.
 * a (major aspects): b (focused):
 * Good coverage without unnecessary trivia
 * 1) It follows the neutral point of view policy.
 * Fair representation without bias:
 * 1) It is stable.
 * No edit wars, etc.:
 * 1) It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
 * a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
 * Image has suitable non-free use rationale, sound samples are compliant with Wikipedia criteria.
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass/Fail:
 * Just one minor issue, on hold for seven days.
 * OK, all good now, listing as GA. Congratulations! Jezhotwells (talk) 17:06, 21 March 2011 (UTC)
 * Just one minor issue, on hold for seven days.
 * OK, all good now, listing as GA. Congratulations! Jezhotwells (talk) 17:06, 21 March 2011 (UTC)


 * "song" -> "composition". Thanks! -- Noj r (talk) 17:04, 21 March 2011 (UTC)