Talk:Ron Jarvis

Requested move 26 February 2017

 * The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the move request was: moved. No opposition. Primefac (talk) 21:37, 26 March 2017 (UTC)

R. G. Jarvis → Ron Jarvis – The only cited source calls him Ron Jarvis, which is already a redirect to here. Dicklyon (talk) 16:43, 26 February 2017 (UTC) Relisted. Jenks24 (talk) 05:04, 7 March 2017 (UTC)
 * Support WP:RECOGNIZABLE -- Red rose64 &#x1f339; (talk) 19:00, 26 February 2017 (UTC)
 * Comment. Looking at Google Books results there's not much in it "Ron Jarvis" 1660 results versus "R. G. Jarvis" 1340 results  but the results for 'Ron Jarvis' look very random and don't necessarily relate to this topic. Zarcadia (talk) 21:53, 28 February 2017 (UTC)
 * I agree there are not many sources for this guy; most of those are not, and the ones that are (of the R. G. Jarvis) are from paper citations, not representative of what he would be called in a context that's not so strongly styled toward initials. Dicklyon (talk) 22:43, 28 February 2017 (UTC)
 * Actually, it looks like "Ronald Jarvis" would be an even better choice, more common in sources. Dicklyon (talk) 22:53, 28 February 2017 (UTC)
 * Relisting comment. Needs more input about, especially with Ron v Ronald. Jenks24 (talk) 05:04, 7 March 2017 (UTC)
 * Support "Ron Jarvis" per WP:COMMONNAME. It's used in the book written about him, which appears to be the best source available (and the only one cited here).--Cúchullain t/ c 16:38, 16 March 2017 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.