Talk:Ron Kind

Untitled
There is a HELL of a lot of controversy in and around the Kind & Nelson campaigns. How is it possible that none of that appears on either of their entries? -- Frankie
 * That's easy: you haven't made the case that the mud Nelson was slinging at Kind was encyclopedia-worthy. If you can't make that case yourself, who were you hoping would do it for you?  The comments responding to his Youtube attack on Kind, which comes across as though it's targeted to those with an IQ below 80, are pretty accurately summarized by the 36-th most recent one, "It's nice to see that these disingenuous smear ads didn't fool the voting public. Shame on you Paul Nelson. Shame."  They seem to have fooled you though.  --Vaughan Pratt (talk) 04:28, 16 May 2010 (UTC)

= I = just saw Paul_R._Nelson | Paul__Nelson's commercial. I have little idea how much is true &/or false; but, it sure is rude.

hopiakuta ; &#91;&#91; &lt;nowiki&gt; &lt;/nowiki&gt; { &#91;&#91;%c2%a1]] &#91;&#91;%c2%bf]] &#91;&#91; %7e%7e%7e%7e ]] } ;]] 20:56, 26 October 2006 (UTC)

Copied material
User:Rushadthomas has introduced a large section into this article which is copied from Ron Kind's website at the House of Representatives here and pasted into the article here. WP:CV states that the article should be either speedily deleted, or reverted back to a clean revision that does not include any copyrighted material. However, since the material comes from a federal government website it is possible that the material is in the public domain (as work of the United States Government). If the copied material is not public domain the article needs to be reverted to this revision.--Oden 07:43, 21 December 2006 (UTC)

Section Controversies: Rangel ethics probe
What exactly is the controversy cited here? The pay for talk thing makes sense to include in a controversies section (though I'd argue if that's the only controversy it's better placed within Section 2.2 Tenure). Why exactly should not publicly demanding Rangel resign be a controversy? He didn't defend him by any means so...? Mpen320 (talk) 20:07, 17 January 2024 (UTC)