Talk:Ronald P. Karlsberg

Feedback from New Page Review process
I left the following feedback for the creator/future reviewers while reviewing this article: With a low publication rate, no major awards or fellowships from a major society whether he meets notability is dubious, and should be proved better. The removal of the tag by an anonymous IP user who had made no other edits raises flags.

Ldm1954 (talk) 02:31, 24 April 2024 (UTC)
 * Scopus shows 100 publications with H-index of 33, which is about what you might expect for a full US clinical professor who reaches WP:NPROF. I note that several of the references were cited as web citations, but actually I think that they're better framed as news articles - their authors were identifed on the page and the date of publication declared - I've added this additional information for a few examples. I've also linked the usual academic indexing sites through Wikidata so that his publication record is easier to see. Klbrain (talk) 13:53, 24 April 2024 (UTC)