Talk:Ronen Eldan

Contested deletion
This page should not be speedy deleted as an unambiguous copyright infringement, because to my opinion it does not constitute such a harsh request. If the requester sees flaw in the way things were phrased let him point them out so they may be recrified. I for one have made an effort so as to phrase it in a manner that does not constitute such a course of action. --Omer Toledano (talk) 20:09, 12 February 2022 (UTC)

Furthermore, if indeed there is fault, I have every intention of fixing it, just please don't delete the article. Awaiting your reply. Omer Toledano (talk) 20:22, 12 February 2022 (UTC)


 * Omer Toledano, you clearly know what the copyright infringements were as you have attempted to reword them. Please see Plagiarism. --John B123 (talk) 20:33, 12 February 2022 (UTC)
 * Naturally. Likewise, any proactive assistance in trying to rectify the situation by rephrasing text which is deemed unsuitable would also be appreciated. --Omer Toledano (talk) 06:46, 13 February 2022 (UTC)
 * Hi all. I believe I have sufficiently rephrased and reworded the article enough so as to justify the removal of the copyright template. For your consideration. --Omer Toledano (talk) 08:08, 13 February 2022 (UTC)

, as you requested I have initiated a temporary rewrite page. I believe the disputed 2.5 sentences are now in compliance. --Omer Toledano (talk) 15:00, 13 February 2022 (UTC)