Talk:Roosevelt High School (Oregon)

Start or C class?
I bumped this article's quality class up to Start after some major edits were made by others. Wondering now if it should be C-class — it has good sources but could be longer. —AnAwesomeArticleEditor (talk contribs ) 21:04, 27 January 2018 (UTC)


 * I agree that the article could be expanded. There are still some gaps in the history section and the school profile section could be expanded with info on the school's efforts to improve academic achievement. It might be good to create a section on the school's athletic programs as well. I'm not too familiar with the quality scale criteria, so I'll leave the call on whether the article currently warrants C-class up to you. If I get around to expanding the article, I'll let you know or post another message on the WikiProject assessment page. Lord Bolingbroke (talk) 21:55, 27 January 2018 (UTC)
 * Also, thanks for responding to my assessment request so quickly! I appreciate it. Lord Bolingbroke (talk) 21:59, 27 January 2018 (UTC)

Refs
Here are some sources that could be used to expand the article: Lord Bolingbroke (talk) 20:06, 30 November 2018 (UTC)

Requested move 14 July 2019

 * The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion. 

The result of the move request was: not moved. No prospect of consensus to move at this time, I'd even say we have a (very) rough consensus not to move. Andrewa (talk) 12:09, 21 July 2019 (UTC)

Roosevelt High School (Oregon) → Roosevelt High School (Portland, Oregon) – We should disambiguate by city, not state. -- Another Believer ( Talk ) 07:21, 14 July 2019 (UTC)
 * Is there a guideline about this? Pinging, since he was the editor who changed the article title to state-only disambiguation. – Lord Bolingbroke (talk) 07:58, 14 July 2019 (UTC)
 * Disambiguation should be as simple as possible. If this is the only Roosevelt High School in Oregon, the title is correct. If there are multiple ones, then Portland, Oregon would be correct. Portland alone would never be correct, as there are numerous Portland's in the US, some with great prominence (Portland, Maine for example. John from Idegon (talk) 14:47, 14 July 2019 (UTC)
 * Yeah, I was basically going to say the same thing that John said. General practice for schools has been to use the state only. The only time you need the city is when there's more than one school of the same name in the same state. Is there another Roosevelt High School in Oregon we're not aware of? --JonRidinger (talk) 17:04, 14 July 2019 (UTC)
 * Unless for some reason there are schools that are not reporting to NCES, there are two Elementary, one middle, and this school. John from Idegon (talk) 17:48, 14 July 2019 (UTC)
 * Thanks for the info. The only reason I'm inclined to support this move is for consistency with the other articles in Category:High schools in Portland, Oregon, which all include "Portland" in their disambiguation. This method of disambiguation appears to have been established by (see, e.g., ). – Lord Bolingbroke (talk) 18:30, 14 July 2019 (UTC)
 * It's written somewhere, but I'll be damned if I can remember where, but disambiguation of schools is supposed to be standardized by state. I'm relatively sure that's because the state Wikiprojects predated the school Wikiproject. In present day terms, that seems kind of silly,  as most state projects have died. The state only disambiguation is the preferred method for states that did not have an already established way of doing it. I frankly think that the way of doing things like disambiguation should fall to the broadest scope project watching the page, which in this case is Schools. We are here for the readers. Doing it the same for all schools should be the goal, just to make it easier for the reader. John from Idegon (talk) 19:05, 14 July 2019 (UTC)
 * I did a quick survey of articles with 'High School' in their name which use parenthetical disambiguators. 1,808 use a disambiguator of the form "(X, Y)" (including 17 that use "Portland, Oregon"). A bit more than 2,500 use just a state name (including 52 with just "Oregon"). Around 500 use just a city name (e.g. "(Los Angeles)", "(Chicago)", etc. 0 uses of bare "Portland" though) This seems roughly consistent with what John and Jon are saying. (Except that there also seems to be relatively common practice of using the city name alone if it's unambiguous) Colin M (talk) 22:59, 14 July 2019 (UTC)
 * I'd be willing to wager that many of those you've found are in New York, where the state project is rather insistent on adding disambiguation whether needed or not. John from Idegon (talk) 01:01, 15 July 2019 (UTC)
 * You would lose that wager! Well, depending on how you define 'many'. The top 5 values of Y for (X, Y) disambiguators are California (155), Ohio (144), Texas (96), Illinois (60), and Virginia (54). New York is seventh with 46 articles. The top value that isn't a US state is Ontario, with 13 articles. Colin M (talk) 01:22, 15 July 2019 (UTC)
 * Yeah, plus in just doing raw counts, quite a few school names do have multiple uses in the same state and thus require the city with the state. Ultimately, the reason for excluding the city unless absolutely necessary is practical: it's shorter to type "Roosevelt High School (Oregon)" vs. "Roosevelt High School (Portland, Oregon)" since the article link is almost always going to be piped to "Roosevelt High School". It goes along with WP:PRECISION: "Usually, titles should unambiguously define the topical scope of the article, but should be no more precise than that." If you look at the edit summary for Cleveland High School (Portland, Oregon), it cites WP:NC(S), which links to a list of links of failed naming conventions for schools. At that point in 2007, there were some editors who decided that every high school article disambiguation needed the city and state (reflected in at least one of the failed naming conventions), which is why so many have it. Valfontis seems to be the main editor who did it to quite a few high school articles in Oregon, none of which needed additional disambiguation, but it was the prevailing consensus (or perceived or even presumed consensus) at the time. --JonRidinger (talk) 05:07, 16 July 2019 (UTC)
 * Support. After giving it some thought, I think that this article title should be aligned with the others in Category:High schools in Portland, Oregon. I agree with John's point that standardizing disambiguation will make things easier for the reader. Realistically, however, the vast majority of readers who come to this article will come from other articles about Oregon schools. Since disambiguation by both city and state is the de facto standard for Oregon schools, I think aligning this article with that standard will improve the readers' experience. (I, for one, was definitely confused to see that this article didn't match the titles of other Portland public high schools when I first started working on it.) Whether or not Oregon schools should use this method of disambiguation to begin with is a good discussion to have—but that consensus should be established at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Oregon or another general forum rather than at a specific move request. – Lord Bolingbroke (talk) 19:14, 16 July 2019 (UTC)
 * I acknowledge your position here as valid and within the current accepted practice, which I oppose, so my !vote on this is hearby changed to Neutral. I think an RfC on this issue should be done at either VPP or the school project,  with notifications to all the state projects and task forces and to WP:USA. Taking it state by state will defeat the purpose of doing it. John from Idegon (talk) 19:36, 16 July 2019 (UTC)
 * Oppose Current title is superior in terms of WP:CONCISENESS. The proposed title has the merit of, let's say, "local consistency" with most of the articles in Category:High schools in Portland, Oregon. But I think consistency with high school articles as a whole is more important, and in the realm of those thousands of articles, there's a pretty strong tendency to use only the state (or sometimes only the name of the city), if it's unambiguous. I see no logical reason why different US states should have different naming conventions for disambiguating high school articles, and it sounds like a bureaucratic nightmare. Colin M (talk) 20:17, 16 July 2019 (UTC)
 * It is a bureaucratic nightmare. John from Idegon (talk) 01:02, 17 July 2019 (UTC)
 * Oppose, in case it wasn't clear from my comments, and the fact I was the one who moved it back to "(Oregon)". Agree with Colin M about WP:CONCISE as well. --JonRidinger (talk) 21:51, 16 July 2019 (UTC)
 * Oppose per WP:LOCALCONSENSUS. Absent a more specific official guideline, we should disambiguate to only the required precision. -- King of &hearts;   &diams;   &clubs;  &spades; 01:26, 21 July 2019 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

Hey, I'm late to the party. So I see it ended up getting moved anyway. Anybody know why? I swear there was once a guideline that I was adhering to. It wasn't just something I made up at work one day. I'm OK with simplifying it but curious what happened and also why better clean up was not done, post-move. Valfontis (talk) 08:14, 16 August 2020 (UTC)
 * Oh, I see, the consensus was to not move it *back*. I'm still curious when this got applied to all the other Oregon articles though. Valfontis (talk) 08:17, 16 August 2020 (UTC)