Talk:Rootin Tootin Luton Tapes

Delete infobox
A set of Split Enz demos barely qualifies for a Wiki entry; it certainly doesn't rate an infobox. At the moment it's a proposed album with a suggested tracklist. Grimhim 03:39, 3 February 2007 (UTC)

- That was a bit unnecessary, but I guess the box can be re-added when it is released. Sure, in some views a set of demos wouldn't qualify for a wiki entry, but this is going to get an official release so will qualify as a Split Enz album. The latest Frenz newsletter (came in the post today) has additional details for the release. Eddie Rayner has basically stated that he will resume mixing them in April & it should be finished shortly after. Dizrythmia 20:48, 23 March 2007

Something should be added about David Tickle --Mutley 15:45, 6 July 2007 (UTC)

WikiProject class rating
This article was automatically assessed because at least one WikiProject had rated the article as start, and the rating on other projects was brought up to start class. BetacommandBot 19:43, 28 August 2007 (UTC)

Fair use rationale for Image:Rootintootinluton.jpg
Image:Rootintootinluton.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot (talk) 20:14, 26 November 2007 (UTC)