Talk:Rose-Lynn Fisher

Notability
JohnCD, do you not think that Fisher is notable?

If no you do not, then you might consider:


 * http://krant.tijd.be/ipaper/20150530?itm_campaign=newsstream_sabato#paper/sabato_nl/22
 * https://www.welt.de/wissenschaft/article132937605/Was-Nahaufnahmen-von-Traenen-verraten.html
 * https://www.wired.com/2014/05/rose-lynn-fischer-microscopic-tears/#x
 * http://www.newyorker.com/tech/elements/slide-show-the-topography-of-tears#slide_ss_0
 * https://www.theguardian.com/artanddesign/jonathanjonesblog/2014/may/14/lood-semen-tears-artists-bodily-fluids-rose-lynn-fisher
 * http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/newstopics/howaboutthat/10836061/Structure-of-tears-influenced-by-what-makes-us-cry.html
 * http://oglobo.globo.com/cultura/fotografa-cria-arte-partir-de-lagrimas-12736517
 * http://www.theparisreview.org/blog/2014/05/13/the-microscopic-tracks-of-my-tears-and-other-news/
 * http://www.popsci.com/article/science/microscope-images-show-topography-tears
 * http://www.lanacion.com.ar/1643521-la-coleccion-de-lagrimas-de-la-senora-fisher/

And I think that there are more besides. -- Hoary (talk) 22:55, 3 November 2016 (UTC)
 * I don't have time to check all those, but if you believe she is notable, by all means remove the tag and add as many of them as you think useful. I added the tag when declining a speedy immediately after the article was created, with the idea of encouraging its (new) author to improve the references; we had this conversation but they did not do any more. JohnCD (talk) 16:24, 4 November 2016 (UTC)