Talk:Rosendale Theatre/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

Reviewer: Harrison49 21:52, 25 September 2011 (UTC)

GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria


 * 1) Is it reasonably well written?
 * A. Prose quality:
 * Prose is strong throughout.
 * B. MoS compliance for lead, layout, words to watch, fiction, and lists:
 * The article maintains a good style throughout.
 * 1) Is it factually accurate and verifiable?
 * A. References to sources:
 * The article is well referenced with plenty of in-line citations.
 * B. Citation of reliable sources where necessary:
 * Sources used are reliable.
 * C. No original research:
 * There does not appear to be any original research.
 * 1) Is it broad in its coverage?
 * A. Major aspects:
 * B. Focused:
 * The article covers the major aspects and remains focused on the subject.
 * 1) Is it neutral?
 * Fair representation without bias:
 * The article maintains a neutral point of view.
 * 1) Is it stable?
 * No edit wars, etc:
 * The article does not appear to be subject to any edit warring.
 * 1) Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?
 * A. Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales:
 * All images are freely licensed and available on Commons.
 * B. Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions:
 * Captions are concise and informative.
 * 1) Overall: A very interesting read. Well done. Harrison49 (talk) 16:42, 27 September 2011 (UTC)
 * Pass or Fail:
 * Pass or Fail: