Talk:Roses of the Prophet Muhammad

The Daily Show
I don't think mentioning The Daily Show's lampoon is appropriate for this article. The segment was hilarious, yes: "Time to make the Roses of the Prophet Muhammad..." was very good. However, The Daily Show lampoons all sorts of current events, and mentioning that the Daily Show made fun of something doesn't add any useful information. For example, the Iraq War article doesn't mention The Daily Show's ongoing report "Mess-o-potamia" -- nor should it. George W. Bush doesn't contain a mention of the show, and they lampoon him every single night.

Unless The Daily Show was somehow involved in the ROTPM hullabaloo, it isn't notable to mention it in the article. The Daily Show didn't even break the story. Full disclosure: I am a fan of The Daily Show and watch it four times a week.  Cleduc 21:57, 23 March 2006 (UTC)
 * Since there's apparently no argument, I'll remove the reference again. Cleduc 06:47, 30 March 2006 (UTC)
 * Apparently there is argument, so the reference shall stand until the heat death of the universe as far as I care. Cleduc 00:12, 12 April 2006 (UTC)
 * I disagree that there is consensus to keep: I think it's pointless and unencyclopedic, and several have tried to remove it, including me.  However, I'm not going to belabour the issue, as it is far too childish for words. Cleduc 00:01, 1 May 2006 (UTC)
 * Agreed. Do not cite a nonconsensus as a "consensus" to support a reversion. NTK 02:53, 6 May 2006 (UTC)
 * This is pure news trivia. Please AfD it as soon as possible.
 * Peter Isotalo 18:09, 31 July 2006 (UTC)

Factual?
What are the sources that this actually happened? For one, I find it odd that they would even say "danish pastry" in Iran to begin with. In Scandinavia it's called "Wienerbrød", for example.

Fork
I don't really see any reason for keeping a separate article for this. Danish pastry isn't exactly bursting with content and I seriously doubt this is going to get much longer.

Peter Isotalo 23:28, 16 December 2006 (UTC)