Talk:Rosignano Solvay

Wiki reports the following:

1. This article's factual accuracy is disputed. (August 2021) 2. This article needs additional citations for verification. (August 2021) 3. Some of this article's listed sources may not be reliable. (September 2021)

The first point to make is that no-one has owned the dispute or the challenges or given any evidence why this is the case.

1. None of the content has factual inaccuracy. Reuters, Bloomberg, Financial Times and France24 are among the world’s most trusted publishers. Many other news agencies not mentioned have also published exposés. They would not publish anything that was factually incorrect. All of what has been published has arisen over decades of multiple exposés, reports and costly legal challenges to Solvay by political and governmental authorities, news agencies and journalists, activists and the United Nations. The results can be seen from space on Google Maps, the evidence is obvious and clear and well-documented. Even if Solvay was disputing the article, the evidence is overwhelming: 100 years of chemical dumping into the Mediterranean Sea. It has earned Solvay Billions (perhaps Trillions over a century?) of Euros/Dollars ongoing - they will of course try dispute anyone trying to stop them and they have the political, financial and legal resources to do so effectively. All of Europe and the nations native to the Mediterranean Sea are affected - millions of people, sea life and ecology.

2. Citations are provided for every aspect of the article.

3. NONE of the sources are unreliable. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Befreeuk (talk • contribs) 07:01, 22 June 2024 (UTC)