Talk:Rosmah Mansor/Archive 1

NPOV dispute - Constroversies
The paragraph on Rosmah being at the murder site is written with malicious intent. The reference cited by the author is the Malaysia Today blogpost by Raja Petra Kamaruddin regarding the Bala statutory declaration and has not been independently verified by any member of the conventional media, and internet media in Malaysia. I've reverted it twice but User:Absalom66 keeps re-adding them. I'm going to rewrite it in more neutral language – though I still disagree with it being there. - Yk3 talk · contrib 15:50, 7 June 2011 (UTC)

Early life
This paragraph
 * A biography about first lady was soft-launched by the Sultan of Pahang, Sultan Ahmad Shah on 10 December 2012. The biography has 164 pages and is written in an informal and relaxed tone.[4] It is written by Siti Rohayah Attan and Noraini Abdul Razak and is slated to be published in January 2013.[5] Yayasan Amanah Perdana Malaysia chairman Shamsulbahrin Ludin, the book's publisher, said the biography will tell about Rosmah Mansor's life from her childhood to the present, which includes her life at Tunku Kurshiah College and her involvement in community work. It also includes some facts that have never been told to anyone. It also includes a special chapter where Rosmah addresses the public rumours surrounding her life and involvement in current events

does not contain anything pertaining to her early life, besides pointing out that an account of her early life has been soft-launched, and in my opinion should be removed. Would like to seek the opinion of senior Wikipedians on this. Jumpt (talk) 08:39, 25 November 2013 (UTC)

Article balance
My first impression of the article is that the criticism section is disproportionately larger than the rest of the article. While most of it is cited (haven't checked the reliability of the sources though), I have concerns that this might be violating WP:BLP and WP:NPOV. Yes, she faces a lot of criticism, but I don't think we need to list down every single bit, just the more notable ones in a concise manner. Can someone help looking into this? -- Joshua Say "hi" to me!What I've done? 03:28, 5 January 2015 (UTC)
 * The article is certainly dominated by criticism. That is because the article subject is most notable for various scandals. There is not much else to write about.  --TheroadtoWiganPier (talk) 15:30, 1 August 2015 (UTC)

External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to 1 one external link on Rosmah Mansor. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/20131203052733/http://www.nst.com.my/life-times/sunday-life-times/rosmah-bestowed-highest-award-by-us-varsity-1.55261 to http://www.nst.com.my/life-times/sunday-life-times/rosmah-bestowed-highest-award-by-us-varsity-1.55261

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

— Gorthian (talk) 18:27, 1 February 2016 (UTC)

Cheers.—cyberbot II  Talk to my owner :Online 03:59, 1 February 2016 (UTC)

External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to 1 one external link on Rosmah Mansor. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:
 * Added archive http://web.archive.org/web/20131203002743/http://thestar.com.my/news/story.asp?file=/2012/2/13/nation/10726749&sec=nation to http://thestar.com.my/news/story.asp?file=/2012/2/13/nation/10726749&sec=nation

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

Cheers.—cyberbot II  Talk to my owner :Online 23:16, 26 February 2016 (UTC)

Semi-protected edit request on 5 July 2016
I wish to submit reference to Rosmah Mansor's recognition by the Centre for Economic and Leadership Leadership (CELD) here

Bomabenjy (talk) 00:56, 5 July 2016 (UTC)

Bomabenjy (talk) 00:56, 5 July 2016 (UTC)
 * Deactivating request for now as page is pending a copyvio investigation. nyuszika7h (talk) 21:08, 5 July 2016 (UTC)

Copyright violation rewrite
I came across this copyright violation from a Reddit submission. My investigation and comment is here.

My rewrite nukes the entire Achievement section, as it was copied from two sources. I then rewrote it using her official page on the Prime Minister's Office website and a few other sources. I also moved the paragraph about her biography to this section, shortening it to reflect the present-day.

I don't believe any history revisions can be deleted because the initial copyright violation was made in 2012, and there's been a lot of edits since then.

I suspect there may be a neutrality issue with this article, but I think that should be tackled later. For now, it would be nice to get the copyright violation out of the way.

x42bn6 Talk Mess 11:42, 23 July 2016 (UTC)
 * I had a couple of people look at the re-write, and it's still not adequate. The discussion is here. — Diannaa (talk) 13:10, 14 August 2016 (UTC)

Copyright problem removed
Prior content in this article duplicated one or more previously published sources. The material was copied from: http://malaysiansmustknowthetruth.blogspot.it/2010/07/rosmah-rousing-rose.html, http://www.pmo.gov.my/datinrosmah/?dsr=others&num=8, http://celdng.org/datin-paduka-seri-rosmah-mansor/ and http://ireport.cnn.com/docs/DOC-571969, at the least. Copied or closely paraphrased material has been rewritten or removed and must not be restored, unless it is duly released under a compatible license. (For more information, please see "using copyrighted works from others" if you are not the copyright holder of this material, or "donating copyrighted materials" if you are.)

For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or published material; such additions will be deleted. Contributors may use copyrighted publications as a source of information, and, if allowed under fair use, may copy sentences and phrases, provided they are included in quotation marks and referenced properly. The material may also be rewritten, providing it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Therefore, such paraphrased portions must provide their source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with these policies. Thank you. Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 22:10, 1 February 2017 (UTC)