Talk:Rote Zora (group)

"No injuries" claim
No injuries? This link from a Canadian anarchist says that they deliberately shot a police officer in the kneecaps.

http://theanarchistlibrary.org/HTML/Ann_Hansen__Julie_Belmas__This_Is_Not_A_Love_Story__Armed_Struggle_Against_The_Institutions_Of_Patriarchy.html

"Attacks such as the one on the Center for the Central Register in Cologne, or the kneecapping of Hollenburg — the Chief of Immigration Police in West Berlin — show the wide range of these militant politics."

I've deleted that claim, which has been uncited for well over a year. I think this article could benefit generally from some more citing and research generally. "The Red Army Faction, a Documentary History" looks like it has quite a lot about the RZ, although I imagine there will be more information available in German. sorsoup (talk) 02:31, 18 September 2011 (UTC)

Terrorist group
The article introduction refers to rote zora as a "militant feminist group". Judging by the fact that they are responsible for over 40 bombings, which include bombing such places as the federal constitutional court, having them referred to as a terrorist - not militant, group would be the most accurate. Does anyone have any objections to me changing that section? --1.152.106.235 (talk) 23:45, 28 January 2018 (UTC)
 * As there are no objections, it will be changed. --2001:8003:548A:5600:3DF3:DDB8:BFA1:6626 (talk) 02:22, 1 February 2018 (UTC)