Talk:Rotter kidnapping/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

Nominator: 03:03, 24 March 2024 (UTC)

Reviewer: Arconning (talk · contribs) 06:31, 10 June 2024 (UTC)

I will be reviewing this, comments will probably be finished in the next 72 hours! Arconning (talk) 06:31, 10 June 2024 (UTC)

Infobox and lead

 * Change dating system on infobox to dmy, check List of date formats by country as the topic is in Liechtenstein.


 * Lead is a bit short but it's alright.


 * Probably mention the other victims and specify the names of the perpetrators.
 * Not sure if this is necessary, might convolute the lead a bit.

Background

 * by 1933, Nazism in Germany, and in January 1933, due to this, from the press, add comma at the end.


 * Jewish background, pluralize.


 * emigrated, emigrate.


 * as they falsely accused, change to who falsely accused.

Kidnapping

 * along with Alfred's wife, Fritz's domestic partner, Gaflei on the Alps, though once he realized, who was also injured, re-unite with Julie Wolff, add comma at the end.


 * This however, was unsuccessful as they fought back and began to escape on foot., rewrite, probably omit however.

Trials and aftermath

 * Rheinbeger and Frommelt, add comma after Rheinbeger. Manual of Style, though per the same MoS entry, not really ambiguous therefore it can be kept but I would recommend for it to be added.


 * In October of the same year, Liechtenstein to come to an end, after leave Liechtenstein and, add comma at the end.


 * Italicize mentions of "Stolperstein" in image caption.

Images

 * Images have proper licenses and are relevant.

Refs

 * Reference all seem reliable.
 * For reference 2, remove the "last=Editorial" as it's not the name of the author. Vice versa with reference 4.


 * For reference 6, when using the wikilinked page of an author, use the "authorlink=" template without the [] brackets for the page of the author, then the "first=" and "last=" for the name of the author, so that it's formatted properly.

Spotchecks

 * Earwig picks like 1% which is like negligible. Manual check shows no sign of copyright violations/plagiarism.

Misc

 * No ongoing edit war on the article, focused and broad on the topic considering information about the topic would be a few decades old, no bias seen.
 * Here are my comments, hope they can be addressed. Arconning (talk) 15:42, 11 June 2024 (UTC)
 * Addressed the comments, . Let me know if anything more needs done. Thanks. TheBritinator (talk) 18:43, 11 June 2024 (UTC)