Talk:Rough Landing, Holly/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

Hi, I'm GARDEN  and will be reviewing this article for GA for you. I'm pretty new to the process so apologies if I screw it up a little :D


 * GA review (see here for criteria)


 * 1) It is reasonably well written.
 * a (prose): b (MoS):
 * Good, particularly the pull-quote.
 * 1) It is factually accurate and verifiable.
 * a (references): b (citations to reliable sources):  c (OR):
 * Good references, no obvious doubts.
 * 1) It is broad in its coverage.
 * a (major aspects): b (focused):
 * As broad as it can be. Perhaps focusing a little too much on the video but it is a special one I suppose.
 * 1) It follows the neutral point of view policy.
 * Fair representation without bias:
 * No problems.
 * 1) It is stable.
 * No edit wars etc.:
 * Nor here.
 * 1) It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
 * a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
 * No many images you can add really.
 * 1) Overall: I'm more than happy to pass this, well done!
 * Pass/Fail: