Talk:Roughing the kicker

Merge Roughing the kicker and Roughing the passer
Those two stubs describe very similar concept. I think it is best to merge them. Thoughts? --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus&#124; reply here 08:07, 5 August 2020 (UTC)
 * If anything, it should be the other way around. I'm pretty sure that roughing the passer is also likely stand-along notable, as it got a lot of coverage a couple years ago when the NFL became a lot stricter with the penalty.  Not sure about the kicker one without a search, but roughing the passer is by far the more significant of the two. Hog Farm Bacon 18:58, 7 September 2020 (UTC)
 * Closing, given that there is no support for the proposal as expressed, and no support for the alternative proposal with a stale discussion. Klbrain (talk) 17:26, 6 April 2021 (UTC)

Clarify that contact is legal if after a successful block
The first paragraph of the article indicates that contact is allowed after a successful block. But, the second paragraph seems to contradict that by stating that certain contact is a foul (without qualification). Could we add a qualification about this after the first sentence of the second paragraph? Maybe "...on the ground. It is not a foul if contact is after a successful block. It is not a foul if..." Jrennie (talk) 13:55, 19 December 2021 (UTC)